LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Sun May 30 13:59:14 PDT 2010
Paul Rogers wrote:
> So it seems the HSR needs GCC>4.2, kernel>2.6.19?
I'm not sure about that, but it's possible. I have an older LFS system
that I use for day-to-day work. It is an i686 originally built in Nov
2005 using gcc-4.0.2, Linux 2.6.12, glibc-2.3.6. (SVN-20051118,
approximately LFS-6.1.1). I upgraded it to Linux-188.8.131.52 without
problem (2007), but haven't upgraded tool change components since. I
use another system for my LFS development work now.
>> What if you built a Linux-184.108.40.206 kernel on the host and try that?
> I'd fear that too large a kernel upgrade would require other confuration
> changes in my host system. A patch from what was 17, now 18, to 19
> would probably reduce those chances.
No, I think 220.127.116.11 would be fine. Besides, the only thing you do is
copy bzImage and boot to that. I don't think it would interfere with
anything currently running, but if it did, the only thing needed to
revert is a reboot.
> So it's beginning to look like from my LFS-6.1 system, with gcc-3.4.3
> and linux-18.104.22.168, originally, patched to 22.214.171.124, is just too far
> a chasm?
Possibly. The problem may be not using gcc-4.x.
> The 6.6 book's HSR needs patching? I need an interim step,
> say my own build of 6.3? Is that where we are? If that's confirmed,
> I'll abandon this 6.6 build until I've done that--but I'd like to have
> all your best advice on that--it's twice as much work!
My advice would be to use jhalfs for some arbitrary version of the book
that you choose and just let it run. We know that LFS-6.3 works because
it has been used a lot from the last LiveCD. That would be a good
candidate for an intermediate release.
More information about the lfs-support