[lfs-support] Make errors on Binutils-2.21.1a - Pass 2

Matijn Woudt tijnema at gmail.com
Wed Jan 25 11:19:41 PST 2012


On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 8:14 PM, Dave H <thegenrlftw at gmail.com> wrote:
> hi,
> everything up to this point hasn't produced any errors, however when
> attempting to make, the following is returned:
> ===============================================================
> lfs at computername4:/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build$ make
> make[1]: Entering directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build'
> Configuring in ./intl
> configure: loading cache ./config.cache
> configure: error: `target_alias' has changed since the previous run:
> configure:   former value:  `x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu'
> configure:   current value: `x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu'
> configure: error: `CC' has changed since the previous run:
> configure:   former value:  `gcc'
> configure:   current value: `x86_64-lfs-linux-gnu-gcc -B/tools/lib/'
> configure: error: in `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build/intl':
> configure: error: changes in the environment can compromise the build
> configure: error: run `make distclean' and/or `rm ./config.cache' and start
> over
> make[1]: *** [configure-intl] Error 1
> make[1]: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/binutils-build'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> ===============================================================
>
> ALSO would like to note that on the previous step, "adjusting the tool
> chain", i received a different output than what was specified.
>
>       [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2]
> in stead of
>       [Requesting program interpreter: /tools/lib/ld-linux.so.2]
>
>
> Any thought or suggestions for where I should be looking to fix this?  I'm
> pretty lost and really dont want start randomly fixing the problems above,
> diverting from the manual i've followed to the letter, then subquently have
> more problems later.
>
> thanks for your time,
> -dave
>

Hi,

You should remove the binutils-build directory after the first pass
(and preferably the source dir too). That should fix the problem I
think.

Matijn



More information about the lfs-support mailing list