[lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
erratic at devel.ws
Wed Nov 14 14:49:37 PST 2012
From: lfs-support-bounces at linuxfromscratch.org [mailto:lfs-support-bounces at linuxfromscratch.org] On Behalf Of Ken Moffat
Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 2:43 PM
To: LFS Support List
Subject: Re: [lfs-support] still doesnt work right (after binutils pass 2)
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:35:13PM -0800, Paige Thompson wrote:
> What does an ldd of a tools/bin/as look like for you?
After pass 1, no idea. And after pass 2 I would only be able to tell you after I chrooted - assuming I hadn't deleted /tools which I normally do soon after the system boots.
So, perhaps I was mistaken when I said yours shouldn't link to /usr/lib - that's the trouble with people firing a string of questions after continuing beyond the first failure - the situation is muddied by all the reports. If I was wrong, my apologies, chalk one up to yourself if you wish to keep score, and feel free to disregard anything I say ;)
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I actually came to the conclusion that it was due to the simple fact that the executable's link pathes pointed to /lib64/ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 which is fine except on the host system it doesn't work due to the difference in the host system'd ld-linux-x86_64.so.2 difference from the one that it is actually linked against by the compiler (which is located in /tools/lib64/ld-linux-x86_64.so.2....... *OR* something is very wrong with my glibc even though it is the correct version, correct commit in the source tree and everything (as near as I can possibly tell.) It could ALSO be the fact that my host is not running kernel 2.6.25 which seems...absurd because that’s the min version to compile glibc support for and I'm running like 3. Something.
It'll have to wait until I return home, if I'm right, which I'm next to fairly certain I am this is really going to pay off, cross your fingers, if not I'm sure I'll eventually figure it out and be that much better off for it. At least I'm at a point where I can kinda have an idea for what might be wrong and I assume this will help a lot in the future. I really hope so because I'm tired of Ubuntu, I'm tired of mailing lists, I don't like dealing with people to get what I want.
More information about the lfs-support