[lfs-patches] r2900 - trunk/gst-plugins-base

Armin K. krejzi at email.com
Tue May 27 15:08:08 PDT 2014


On 27.5.2014 22:33, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 10:20:29AM -0700, bdubbs at higgs.linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
>> Author: bdubbs
>> Date: Tue May 27 10:20:29 2014
>> New Revision: 2900
>>
>> Log:
>> Fix gst-plugins naming
>>
>> Added:
>>     trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4_9_0_i686-1.patch
>>        - copied unchanged from r2899, trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
>>     trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-1.2.4-gcc_4_9_0_i686-1.patch
>>        - copied unchanged from r2899, trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-1.2.4-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
>> Deleted:
>>     trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
>>     trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-1.2.4-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
>>
>> Copied: trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4_9_0_i686-1.patch (from r2899, trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch)
>> ==============================================================================
> Bruce,
>
>   this has got me scratching my head.  I can't see what changed.  By
> pasting the file names I get
>
> added   trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4_9_0_i686-1.patch
> from    trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
> deleted trunk/gst-plugins-base/gst-plugins-base-0.10.36-gcc_4.9.0_i686-1.patch
>

Old one had gcc_4.9.0
New one has gcc_4_9_0

Note the dots in the first one and underscores in second one.

>   and similarly for 1.2.4 : the names appear identical to me, but
> subversion obviously sees something different.
>
>   Whatever it is, thanks for doing it.  Trying to work out the
> difference has at least given me something to do during one of my
> kernel builds.  (bisection: on one machine 3.15-rc7 does not suspend,
> or at least does not recover after suspending - I suspect I will
> have a lot of builds because the box does not boot for large parts
> of the 3.15 development cycles because of a radeon problem which was
> fixed in rc7).  Guess I won't be contributing for a while :-(
>
> ĸen
>


More information about the patches mailing list